💨 Abstract
The Centre's decision to re-designate the post of adviser to the Chandigarh administrator as the chief secretary has been criticized by the AAP, Congress, and SAD, who claim it is a direct attack on Punjab's legitimate claim over the Union Territory. They argue that the appointment of a chief secretary is meant for a state, and since Chandigarh is not a state, the decision is unwarranted.
Courtesy: theprint.in
Summarized by Einstein Beta 🤖
Suggested
Waqf Amendment Bill passed in Rajya Sabha after 12 hours of intense debate
Legal pedigree not just entrenched in SC. 1 in 3 HC judges related to judges, ex-judges or lawyers
PM Modi to reinforce India's role in strengthening regional cooperation: BIMSTEC Secy Gen
South Korea's Constitutional Court ousts impeached President Yoon
Tariffs place unnecessary strain on US-India ties: Congressman Krishnamoorthi
Legendary actor Manoj Kumar passes away at 87
Scale of cover up at each stage—SC's blistering critique of WBSSC in school jobs scam
Endorsing Waqf Bill, ex-PM Deve Gowda washes hands of any kind ‘of ism’, including secularism
Trump tariffs provoke world condemnation and fears of a $2,300 iPhone
Melbourne Cricket Ground to beef up security after two charged with guns at football match
Powered by MessengerX.io