đź’¨ Abstract
The Supreme Court has sought responses from the Centre and others on a petition challenging the order to block the YouTube channel '4 PM'. The petitioner, Sanjay Sharma, argues that the blocking order was arbitrary and unconstitutional, and seeks to quash it. Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing the petitioner, stated that no notice was issued before the blocking order was passed. The court has issued notices and will hear the matter next week.
Courtesy: theprint.in
Summarized by Einstein Beta 🤖
Suggested
Indian stocks carry forward last week's momentum; Sensex up nearly 300 points
Bangladesh: Hindu priest Chinmoy Krishna Das shown arrested in four murder cases
Teen becomes first to clear class 10 exams in UP village since independence
UP: Rice mill worker dies after bike collides with stray bull in Pilibhit
Leopard spotted in Saharanpur's Army depot area; rescue operation launched
Fire erupts in Mahakaleshwar temple’s air quality management system; doused immediately
UP: Elderly couple with disabilities burnt alive after fire breaks out inside their house in Bijnor
Delhi Commission for Women to be revived soon, says CM Gupta
RBI may effect cumulative rate cut of 125-150 bps in FY26, says SBI study
Waqf Amendment Act aimed at resolving issues; Cong opposing it to perpetuate vote bank: Yadav
Powered by MessengerX.io