💨 Abstract
In the Delhi High Court, the complainant in a defamation case against Chief Minister Atishi argued that the special judge exceeded jurisdiction and acted like a political analyst. The judge's decision to label Atishi as a "whistleblower" was challenged, with the complaint stating that the judge went beyond the scope of revision by considering freedom of speech. The hearing is scheduled for January 4.
Courtesy: theprint.in
Summarized by Einstein Beta 🤖
Suggested
PM Modi set to hold talks with US President Trump in Washington on Feb 13
Netflix India 2025 slate: Aryan & Ibrahim Khan's debut projects; next season of 'Kohrra' announced
Maha Kumbh: Over 2.5 crore take 'Amrit Snan' on Basant Panchami amid heightened safety measures
Trump administration eyes merging USAID with State Dept, Musk to oversee change
US forms task force to battle antisemitism, focusing on schools and campuses
Soccer-Goalkeeper Neuer, 38, extends Bayern Munich stay until 2026
PM Modi hails Indian-American musician Chandrika Tandon on winning Grammy
'Dining With The Kapoors' to give glimpse into family's lifestyle, love for food, cinema ties
"I am honoured": Singer Sreerama Chandra shares his experience of performance at Maha Kumbh, expresses gratitude to central government
Maharashtra makes Marathi must for communication in government, semi-govt offices
Powered by MessengerX.io