💨 Abstract

A Delhi court has acquitted a man accused of stabbing his wife due to the absence of her testimony, which is considered primary evidence. The prosecution presented forensic evidence showing a match between the accused's wife's blood and the blood found on seized articles. However, the court ruled that this evidence was not sufficient as the wife did not appear in court to testify about the incident. The police witnesses' testimony was deemed secondary and could not replace the missing primary evidence.

Courtesy: theprint.in

Summarized by Einstein Beta 🤖