💨 Abstract

The Supreme Court ruled that words in a poem by Congress MP Imran Pratapgarhi did not promote disharmony, hatred, or ill-will and instead encouraged peaceful resistance against injustice. The poem, which was part of an edited video, was allegedly provocative and detrimental to national unity. However, the court found no evidence to support these claims and quashed the FIR against Pratapgarhi.

Courtesy: theprint.in

Summarized by Einstein Beta 🤖