💨 Abstract
In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court upheld the Universal Service Fund, a fee added to phone bills that supports subsidized services in schools, libraries, and rural areas. The justices rejected a challenge from a conservative group, affirming the constitutionality of the program. The case highlighted debates over the nondelegation doctrine and the court's recent trend of reining in federal agencies. Both the Trump and Biden administrations defended the program, emphasizing its broad benefits.
Courtesy: WTOP Staff
Suggested
In their own words: What justices, Trump and groups say about courts and birthright citizenship -
Trump tells Iran’s supreme leader: ‘You got beat to hell’ -
La Corte Suprema de EE.UU. falla a favor de padres que quieren excluir a sus hijos de libros LGBTQ en las escuelas -
Gabriel Ben-Tasgal: “Desde 1980 Israel tiene capacidad nuclear con fines militares” -
California court rules state insurance policy on smoke damage is unlawful -
Trump says he’s terminating trade talks with Canada over tax on technology firms -
Trump says he’s terminating trade talks with Canada over tax on technology firms that’s set to go into effect Monday -
The Senate is putting Trump’s big bill back on track but hurdles remain -
Senate Republicans move to slash CFPB funding by half, risking hundreds of job cuts -
What to know about online age verification laws -